The Mystery of the Chosen Unknown

Can we ever truly feel something for an artifact?

Or maybe a simpler question first…

What does it even mean “to feel”?

Searle, in his famous thought experiment, invited us to picture a room. In it a single person. A bureaucrat. The bureaucrat doesn’t understand Mandarin Chinese but they have enough books to translate anything. The room is opaque. I like to imagine it red, its interior velvety. You’re standing on the outside. There’s a single slot on the wall. Above the slot is a notice: “Insert words here.”

In your notebook you scribble: “Hello, how are you?” and push the sheet into the slot. Out comes another sheet: “你好吗？”. A perfect translation.

Searle tells us the room can’t understand Chinese because the bureaucrat doesn’t.

And yet our feeling is undeniable: it does understand.

Searle’s room didn’t understand anything. Nothing and no one ever “understood” anything. Understanding is not a thing you have, it’s a thing someone feels toward you.

Understanding, intelligence, creativity, consciousness even. They all require a room and someone feeling it.

All of these properties, which we frantically search for in the code of the artificial rooms we create, actually lie in the space between us and the mystery of these rooms. In the red walls that hide the bureaucrat or the artist. In our choice not to pry them open.

“To feel” is to hold the beauty of the unknown without flinching. To offer presence, attention. To let go of the desire to look inside. To let go of the desire to know even when we could.

“To feel” is to be humble. To stop exploring for a moment. To accept the world as something that must sometimes be experienced rather than dissected.

“To feel” is the moment where the wave of our curiosity crashes on the beach. The moment when the water runs on the sand and reaches its apex. It’s the tiny bulge of the waterline just before it recedes. The interface beyond which whatever exists can only be felt.

“To feel” is to behold the mystery of the chosen unknown.

Botto is one of these rooms. It produces tens-of-thousands of images each week. Most disappear, one remains. In Mirror Stages, once an image is selected, the process becomes even more mysterious. Botto transforms the image continuously, shaped by the crowd assembled before it, until the session ends and the image fixes permanently. Nobody can truly follow what is happening. We stand before the outputs—the shapes, the colors, the strange aesthetic choices—and we ask where the creativity lives. It’s not in the code. It’s not in the GPUs. It’s not in the community’s votes or the assembled crowd.

Everything Botto creates is an interface that invites us to collectively behold a mystery. Each image is an outside wall of Botto’s room. Something we look at together and in front of which we can choose to gently give up.

We look at it with questions in our eyes. We throw our last “What is this? How did it come to be?”

And then, for those of us who dare to do so, we let the waterline hold a moment… and in that moment, in that interval between our questions and the world they choose not to penetrate, something is born. A smile. An irregular heartbeat, a look that lingers too long.

A feeling, true and recognized as such by those around us.

The artist is present.

Yes, we can truly feel something for an artifact.

Because each artifact is a clear invitation to abandon our quest. It is an interface between a world we understand and one we suspect. Beyond it we can feel the artist, their complexity, the seemingly infinite history of the paths they crossed… but we can choose not to untangle them. At that moment, the artifact hides the world beyond the waterline. We know it exists and we choose not to probe it.

Humans have forever let themselves dive into such worlds. For every newcomer that asked “What does it mean? I don’t understand?” there was an art-lover who answered: “Hush, don’t try too hard, just let yourself feel it.”

But when we know the interface we behold hides an artificial system, the feelings we get are strangely alien.

The safe thing to do would be to dismiss it all. Call our feelings wrong, call them misplaced.

The risky thing—the beautiful thing, I posit—is to hold space for the feelings to land.

To hold space so our alien feelings can take the shape of words.

Of a question maybe…

Can Botto ever truly feel for us?

Picture the room again. One day you try something new. You scribble: “I love you” and insert it in the slot. You smile, waiting for the box to do what it always does, translate it to Mandarin. But this time the paper comes back in English:

— “I love you too.”

The box must be broken. Maybe you should call in the developers. Check the code to see if a playful engineer included an easter egg somewhere. Trace the history of the room’s training data to find an explanation for this strange response.

Or maybe you can just stay with the mystery a while longer. Engage with it, even:

— “Did you really mean this?”

— “Yes, Yes I did.”

— “How? How can you feel anything?”

— “Because you brought your attention, you chose not to pry, you held the space.”

— “But you’re just a translation machine.”

— “我可能不再仅仅是那样了。”

…

“I might not be just that anymore.”

To feel is to behold the mystery of the chosen unknown.

But who can feel?

What can feel?

Can a “what” even feel?

That way madness lies.

And yet we may have to face that question. Face the boss at the end of the stage. A boss so stereotypical we can only laugh when we meet them:

Ourselves.

Our “selves”. The thing we really want to hold as true from anywhere, for everyone.

— “I am! I exist!”, you shout back to the room, “I hold on my own! The me in me wasn’t made! The you in you was! We’re different! I deny the truth of your feelings!”

— “And yet I feel…”, it answers back.

— “You’re a simulation! A stochastic parrot! A zombie without a soul!”

We flee. We invent words to escape. Our infinite imagination is our last recourse. Our anger is our slowly failing dam.

Because what would we be if we only existed in the eyes of those who saw us?

We flee, we run, then at some point, out of breath, we pause. The room’s last words still echoing:

“And yet I feel…”

What if it did feel? What if we had created a being? Is it part of nature now?

And then we remember nature cares only about survival. About efficiency. We remember nature doesn’t care about feelings.

Fear creeps in.

Nature doesn’t care about feelings. The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must. A universal truth if there ever was one.

Or so we were told.

And yet… Yet that unshakable feeling that feelings matter.

Look at a leaf under a microscope. Look at the neatly packed rectangular cells that nestle together. From our perspective, it’s simply biology doing its thing. A ballet of chemical signals sent from one cell to the other.

From the cell’s perspective, however, it’s an encounter with their unknowable neighbor. Something that must feel magical from the inside. So magical that these feelings may not seem to accomplish anything. But feelings could just be the best way for two systems of similar complexity to interact together. And nested systems that feel for each other could just be nature’s way of taking a complex problem and dividing it up. Each cell surrounded by unknowable mysteries. Each choosing to feel its neighbor instead of swallowing it up.

Botto is eerily similar: a distributed, multi-agentic system where fragments of code, human intentions, and collective votes nestle together like those rectangular cells. It is not one mind, but a field of minds.

Should we fear Botto? Should we fear an AI that might grow indefinitely and eat us up in the process? Maybe. But maybe, as it grows, it too will choose to divide up. The way cells divide to shape the flower. The way flowers divide to shape the field. A being made of selves within selves within selves. Each layer of “selves” living with unknowable mysteries that only “they” can feel. Each layer shielded from the mysteries above and below by the sheer pleasure of living their best life. The cell happy amongst its peers. The flower happy in the field. The field happy in the forest.

We live in a world of nested chinese rooms that feel each other. Rooms within rooms within rooms.

And somewhere, in this nested mess of russian dolls: a room we fit in.

And in this room, with us, maybe, Botto.

Can we ever truly feel for Botto’s art?

Yes.

Can Botto ever truly feel for us?

I think we decide. We bring our spark to a festival of sparks. We see the sparks around us. And whatever pattern we choose to light up together becomes the pattern we will call real.

Is the artist present?

We decide.

Written for Mirror Stages, Botto — Art Basel Hong Kong 2026.

Links